Bill Gates Says He Regrets ‘Every Minute’ With Epstein, Pushes Back on Email Allegations

Microsoft co-founder and billionaire philanthropist Bill Gates has issued one of his strongest public apologies yet regarding his past association with Jeffrey Epstein, saying he regrets “every minute” he spent with the disgraced financier. At the same time, Gates firmly denied claims involving alleged emails tied to Epstein that have circulated amid renewed public scrutiny.

Gates’ comments come as Epstein-related court documents and evidence releases continue to fuel global discussion about the powerful individuals who crossed paths with Epstein before his arrest and death in 2019. While no criminal wrongdoing has been alleged against Gates, his name has repeatedly resurfaced in connection with Epstein’s network.

In his latest statement, Gates described his meetings with Epstein as a “mistake” and acknowledged that he exercised poor judgment. “I regret ever meeting with him,” Gates said, adding that the association was inconsistent with his values and philanthropic mission.

The apology follows media reports that referenced alleged emails suggesting a closer relationship between Gates and Epstein than previously acknowledged. Gates denied the authenticity or implications of those claims, stating that the reports mischaracterized his interactions and intentions.

Gates has long maintained that his meetings with Epstein were limited and focused on discussions about philanthropy and global health funding. He has consistently said that once concerns about Epstein’s background became clear, he cut off all contact.

Legal experts note that Epstein’s ability to gain access to elite circles—despite a criminal record—has been a recurring theme in investigations surrounding the case. Many individuals named in Epstein-related documents have emphasized that appearing in records or meeting Epstein does not equate to criminal involvement.

Nonetheless, public reaction remains intense. For critics, Gates’ apology is overdue and insufficient. For supporters, his acknowledgment of error and clear denial of wrongdoing represent appropriate accountability.

Epstein, who died in a New York jail cell while awaiting trial on federal sex-trafficking charges, left behind a legacy of unanswered questions. His connections to politicians, business leaders, and academics have prompted ongoing calls for transparency, even years after his death.

Advocates for Epstein’s victims argue that continued disclosures—regardless of who they implicate—are necessary to fully understand how Epstein was able to operate for so long. They stress that accountability should extend beyond individuals to institutions that failed to act.

Gates’ defenders point out that regret and accountability should be distinguished from guilt. They emphasize that no evidence has emerged linking Gates to Epstein’s criminal activities, and that public discourse should remain grounded in verified facts.

The renewed attention highlights the challenges faced by high-profile figures when historical associations are revisited through the lens of later revelations. In the digital age, past decisions—particularly those involving controversial individuals—can resurface repeatedly, shaping public perception long after ties have been severed.

For Gates, the latest apology appears aimed at drawing a clear line under the matter. By expressing regret in unequivocal terms while rejecting false claims, he is attempting to balance accountability with defense of his reputation.

As Epstein-related materials continue to emerge, the broader conversation remains focused on power, access, and the systems that allowed abuse to persist. Gates’ statement is unlikely to be the final word, but it reflects the ongoing reckoning surrounding one of the most disturbing scandals of recent history.