Supreme Court Moves, ICC Blocks: Two Worlds Collide in the Fight to Bring Duterte Home
Today marks a turning point in Philippine politics and global justice: the Supreme Court of the Philippines has officially ordered Malacañang and multiple high-ranking officials to respond to the Duterte family’s habeas corpus petition, even as the ICC Appeals Chamber rejected interim release for former President Rodrigo Roa Duterte — but with crucial new context.
This is the first time BOTH institutions — the Supreme Court and the ICC — publicly take simultaneous action regarding PRRD’s detention and legal status.
Below is the full breakdown:
🏛️ Supreme Court en banc orders the government to answer.
Respondents include:
Executive Secretary Lucas Bersamin
DOJ Secretary Crispin Remulla
DILG Secretary Jonvic Remulla
PNP Chief Gen. Marbil
CIDG leadership
AFP Chief Gen. Brawner
DFA Secretary Enrique Manalo
Immigration Commissioner Tansingco
Key officials tied to PRRD’s transfer and custody
They are REQUIRED to file memoranda within 30 days.
👨👩👧 Petitioners include Duterte’s own children:
Veronica “Kitty” Duterte
Sebastian “Baste” Duterte
Paolo “Pulong” Duterte
They filed petitions to demand government action and accountability.
🪪 Central issue of the petition:
“Bring Rodrigo Duterte home.”
The petition asks the SC to examine whether PRRD’s detention under ICC authority violates constitutional and sovereign protections.
🌍 ICC Appeals Chamber denies interim release BUT confirms new developments.
From ICC lawyer Nicholas Kaufman:
🔸 The ICC has never granted interim release to someone charged with crimes against humanity.
🔸 Duterte’s medical evaluation results will be released next month.
🔸 They will reintroduce the request for release, citing:
PRRD is 80 years old
Suffers debilitating physical conditions
Suffers cognitive decline
Is incapable of flight
Is not a threat to witnesses
This is a CRUCIAL opening for humanitarian release.
🧨 Two legal worlds are now moving at once:
🇵🇭 Supreme Court PH – demanding answers from the Marcos government
🌐 ICC – preparing for medical-based arguments for release
This puts tremendous pressure on Malacañang, which previously asked the SC to deny the Duterte petitions.
🦅 Political and moral implications:
Why did the government NOT protect a former President?
Why is the SC now stepping in?
Why is the ICC acknowledging Duterte’s worsening health?
And why is the narrative suddenly shifting?
The entire nation is waking up to the reality that Duterte’s detention is no longer just a legal battle — it is a humanitarian and constitutional crisis.
📖
“The Lord is a God of justice; blessed are all who wait for Him.” – Isaiah 30:18
When earthly powers fail, God’s timing prevails.
🦅
The Marcos government now has 30 days to explain itself.
The ICC now has 30 days before medical findings emerge.
And the Filipino people now have 30 days to watch history unfold.
This is no longer politics.
This is destiny.
Habang lumalalim ang corruption controversies at budget insertion scandals na nagpapayanig sa kasalukuyang administrasyon, tumayo si Vice President Sara Duterte na may malinaw, diretso, at konstitusyonal na pahayag:
Kung bumaba o ma-impeach si Marcos, she is ready to assume — as mandated by law.
Pero para sa Palasyo, ang pagsasabi ng katotohanan ay “destabilization.”
Ang tanong:
Kapag Duterte ang nagsabi ng totoo, destabilization. Pero kapag sila ang gumagawa ng kalokohan… silence?
Here are the major points from the article:
Palace accuses VP Sara of “political destabilization.”
Simply because she acknowledged the constitutional line of succession.
Her statement: “If the President steps down or is impeached, I am constitutionally next.”
This is basic constitutional knowledge, but sinabayan ng Palasyo ng drama.
VP Sara clarifies: She is not plotting. She is simply READY.
She ran as Vice President with the understanding she is first in line.
ZERO unconstitutional action.
ZERO calls for resignation.
ZERO destabilization.
Pure facts.
VP Sara hits back: ‘Let us ask the people — are you ready for more Mary Grace Piñatots?’
Referring to the alias used by one of the alleged recipients of confidential funds.
A sharp jab highlighting the selective outrage of the administration.
🎧 Stream Buwaya sa Congreso on Spotify, Amazon Music, Itunes, Youtube and Facebook today.
https://open.spotify.com/album/7GkurDB4gUdWB9TlxRpcvP?si=m8jDgQQ_Qxe_kARwO2TwTQ
Apple Music: https://music.apple.com/us/artist/politikanta-minute/1851182606
Visit our website:https://politikantaminute.com/
☕ Support the channel here: buymeacoffee.com/politikantaminute
VP Sara says Marcos’ signature in the 2025 GAA is “best evidence” in budget insertion controversy.
“Hindi ako ang pumirma ng GAB; siya ang pumirma.”
Clear, direct, walang palusot.
Again — straight facts, no destabilization.
VP Sara rejects “military junta,” calls it unconstitutional.
“I stick to the Constitution.”
She rejects extraconstitutional moves — ironically, mas constitutional pa siya kaysa sa mga nagsasabi ng “destabilization.”
VP Sara: Marcos’ refusal of hair follicle drug test is impeachable.
Not an accusation — she cites constitutional principles.
Malacañang again responded with silence.
Palace reaction shows insecurity, not strength.
When the Duterte speaks the truth, Malacañang calls it “destabilization.”
When the Romualdez camp moves silently behind the scenes, they call it “governance.”
“The wicked flee though no one pursues, but the righteous are as bold as a lion.” – Proverbs 28:1
Kaya pala hindi mapakali ang Palasyo— may kumakalabog sa konsensya.
Ang katotohanan, kapag sinabi ng Duterte — halatang masakit.
Pero ang sakit na ‘yan, hindi destabilization.
Konstitusyonal na katotohanan lang.
