When “Facts” Become a Shield

In politics, words matter. Especially when they sound neutral—but land selectively.

This week, Zia Alonto Adiong reminded the public that impeachment should be based on facts, not rumors. A statement that sounds principled on paper—until you notice who the reminder protects, and who it quietly sidelines.

While critics linked to former president Rodrigo Duterte have long faced swift judgment in the court of public opinion, today’s message urges restraint, patience, and constitutional caution—particularly when the spotlight edges closer to Ferdinand Marcos Jr..

Adiong framed impeachment as a “solemn constitutional mechanism,” warning against politicization. Yet seasoned observers note the irony: calls for calm and proof tend to grow louder only when power sits comfortably in place.

The Constitution, after all, does not speak only when convenient. It applies equally—whether the accused is popular, powerful, or politically aligned.

Still, the congressman expressed confidence that the House of Representatives will not be swayed by noise. A reassuring line, depending on which side of the aisle you’re standing on.

In a political climate where standards appear elastic, one lesson emerges quietly:
Facts are essential—but timing, apparently, is everything.