There are moments in politics when silence is safer.
And moments when speaking costs everything.

Batangas Representative Leandro Leviste drew renewed attention after a public post praised his decision to speak out despite mounting pressure, threats, and legal risks tied to corruption allegations surrounding public funds and infrastructure.

READ MORE:HOUSE WATCH | When Stepping Back Becomes the Statement

The post, attributed to MJ Quiambao, frames Leviste’s stand as a test of civic courage—arguing that corruption does not thrive because of powerful actors alone, but because institutions and observers choose caution over confrontation.

Referencing past congressional hearings, including TriCom and QuadCom, the commentary recalls how critics were summoned, discredited, or threatened—while much of the mainstream press and political opposition remained restrained. The message is blunt but measured: neutrality in the face of power abuses eventually becomes complicity.

READ MORE:HOUSE WATCH | When a Witness Steps Forward Before the Door Opens

Leviste himself has said that those who speak today may succeed where earlier voices failed—and that silence will one day be counted not as prudence, but as participation.

The statement does not allege guilt.
It does not assign verdicts.
It instead poses an uncomfortable question:

When the cost of silence is lower than the price of truth—
who decides which bill the nation pays?