The International Criminal Court has rejected an objection filed by the camp of former Philippine president Rodrigo Duterte regarding the appointment of lawyers for alleged victims of his administration’s war on drugs.

The ICC ruled that the process of appointing legal representatives for victims may proceed, dismissing arguments raised by Duterte’s legal team that questioned the court’s authority and procedures. The decision forms part of the tribunal’s ongoing steps in its investigation into the controversial anti-drug campaign.

READ MORE Marcos Faces Impeachment Claims Over ‘Duterte Kidnapping’ Allegations, Flood Control Failures

Duterte’s camp has consistently maintained that the ICC lacks jurisdiction, arguing that the Philippines had already withdrawn from the Rome Statute and that domestic courts are capable of addressing any alleged abuses.

Supporters of the former president view the ruling as another example of external legal pressure being applied to a policy they say restored order and saved communities during a time of rampant criminality. Critics, meanwhile, say the decision strengthens the international case and amplifies the voices of victims’ families.

READ MORE Pulong Duterte Pushes Back: “Impeachment Is Being Forced”

Why It Matters

This ruling does not determine guilt or innocence — but it keeps the ICC process moving forward. For Duterte allies, it reinforces concerns about sovereignty and selective justice. For critics, it represents progress toward accountability. The political and legal battle is far from over.